CITE LIBRE “PLANS” THE GORDON INCIDENT

April 1962

The New Treason of the Clerics

Pierre Trudeau

André Laurendeau

Gérard Pelletier

What is a “straw man” (un homme de paille)?  A straw man is “an effigy in the shape of a man to frighten birds away from seeds”.  What happens in the synthetically manufactured “Gordon Incident” carried out by the Trudeau reds and their friends the RIN Communists?  Gordon (the symbolic stand-in for so-called “British Canada”, meaning Confederation, and for the constitutional railway that links Canada into a nation) is burned in effigy as a straw man, perhaps as “poetic justice” for his alleged racism in placing only incompetent French Canadian “names” on Boards of Directors.  Gordon is burned as a straw man because the poor French Canadians are “birds” who are being kept away from the “seeds” by the nasty “British Canadians” who won’t promote anyone who is really competent!  The whole thing is an imaginary story line, unknowable as a fact.

In effect, Trudeau says that the only French Canadians who get jobs on “Boards of Directors” in “British” Canada are “straw men” (effigies) who are so “incompetent” they can’t rise to the top (i.e., to challenge the “British” feudal power structure), but their French “names” on these “Boards of Directors” “flatter” the French Canadian “nigger kings” who think they have real power, but have none.  And, because of this “British” Canadian “nationalism” which Trudeau claims excludes the French Canadians from real power, French-Canadian “nationalism” will be generated, i.e. the theme of the April 1962 Cité Libre:  “Separatism”, and the object of the Gordon riots and protests in November and December, just a few months away, and preceding again, by an even shorter period, the appearance of the FLQ.

(In fact, “Separatism” is the intended consequence of the November-December 1962 “effigy burnings”.)

Think about it. This is the “omniscient” view, a novelist’s device*; impossible to know for a fact in reality. A statement referring to the novelist’s device of omniscience would read as follows:

“He wrote using the third-person omniscient point of view”.

He’s God, hovering in space, writing a novel, and he knows all his characters, he knows what everyone of them is thinking.  This is not possible in real life.

How could Trudeau or anyone else know that French Canadians on “Boards of Directors” in “British Canada” are “incompetents” who can’t rise to the top?  He can’t know it.  It’s impossible to know.  He has invented it, as a novelist invents his characters and his story, from the omniscient third-person viewpoint.  Trudeau’s invented story, his diatribe, is demagoguery:  an impassioned appeal to prejudice and emotions of the populace to incite them.

In criminal law, it would be sedition, since it does result in serious protests, injuries, riots and near riots, with a view to destroying Canada by generating racism among the founding peoples to whom the Constitution belongs.  It is the Constitution under attack:  precisely at the time these reds want to carry out State controlled socialist planning and need the federal powers.  They also need to dismantle Canada into Moscow-style city-states.

Trudeau knows the story line because he is one of its authors, along with the far-left Communist RIN who are going to execute the story line, they are going to literally act out the morality play, and burn Gordon “in effigy”.  In the process, they will draw their audience into the action with them.  The action will spur some in the audience to replay the original morality play, and burn Gordon in effigy elsewhere.

______

* Another Communist agent who uses the novelist’s device of omniscience to curry sedition against the British and French Canadians is Mark Starowicz, on KGB payroll in the late 60s-early 70s.  In a very nasty put-down to the founders of Canada, and an elegy to multiculturalism and our demise, Starowicz illustrates the narrow-minded, stuck-up bigotry of the founders of Canada by saying that ‘nobody wanted to talk to the old man with the thick accent’ (his father, who fled Argentina for Canada after his trucking business went bankrupt.)  How could Starowicz possibly “know” that “nobody” wanted to talk to his father because of the “old man’s” “thick accent”?  Or because he was a foreigner?  He couldn’t.  Starowicz has used a novelist’s device, omniscience, to create the seditious impression that the founders of Canada are racists; who therefore deserve to be replaced by the waves of mass immigration that have been illegally undertaken for Soviet-Zionist multiculturalism.

How about “active measures”, how did Bezmenov define that?

______

“The Donald Gordon Incident” — First Draft, April 1962, Cité Libre

Look at the elements.  This is the “Gordon Incident” in planning (it’s a draft) six months before Lesage’s second election //// (expecting to hold a referendum by 1965 and having no public motivation to base one on)//// ; and 7 months before the actual “Gordon Incident”, which has been altered, edited and polished, and is broken by La Presse (under the communist-continentalist control) of André Laurendeau as Editor-in-Chief.

D R A F T

In the “draft” above, published in April 1962 as implied “fact”, but which is pure demagoguery, Trudeau claims that the only French Canadians allowed onto “Boards of directors” are “incompetents” who can’t rise to the top; and he says this is deliberate by the “British” English to keep the French down as “niggers”.

In the “final” version, which is acted out in the parliamentary committee and the press, Donald Gordon is accused of appointing NO French Canadians to the CN Board of Directors; and he is maliciously misquoted as allegedly saying he can’t find any French Canadians “competent enough” to occupy these advanced posts.

The story has changed; but the conclusion is the same:  it is “inevitable” that the “British” Canadian nation will engender French-Canadian “nationalism”.

The process of “engendering” is artificially managed by Communists posing as patriots, RIN and Landry, who lead protests, near-riots, riots and effigy-burnings while both La Presse and Le Devoir, the two main French daily papers in Quebec viciously misquote Donald Gordon.

Who’s running the whole show? CITE LIBRE. It’s two founders and co-publishers (Trudeau, Pelletier) and their pal Laurendeau of the continentalist-Institut. Pelletier is editor-in-chief of La Presse that breaks the revised “story”; Laurendeau is Editor in Chief of Le Devoir and “reacts” to the story. In 1964, Pelletier will be fired from La Presse by its Catholic owners for his leftist activities.

What does the Gordon Incident produce? Almost immediate demands for a formal “inquiry”. First, an inquiry at CN; second and most important, on the suggestion of Soviet agent Pearson, a “royal commission”… to be co-chaired by none other than La Presse editor in chief, Andre Laurendeau. The plot is kept well under control by a bunch of reds. Laurendeau ends up sitting on the committee generated by the false stories planted about French Canadians at CN and Donald Gordon. What will the committee do? It will first of all be staffed by well known socialists, plus one Catholic priest as camouflage (Laurendeau laughs in his Diary on the Bi & Bi); The supposed object of the committee is the ethnic needs of the French Canadians; instead, the Bi & Bi ends up recommending multiculturalism (Sovietism) and this is picked up by the Commie UN that uses Canada as a “model” for everyone else to emulate.

How does it produce it? By deliberately generating RACISM to break up the country.

Then, lower the voting age! These students are so stupid, you definitely want htem to vote!

Then, out of this debacle, when Lesage is thrown out by the voters, and Johnson drops dead, and the hoped-for “patriation” scheduled for 1965 thus doesn’t pan out (they were going to hide the coup on Canada after a “yes” with an act of UK parliament; same attempt repeated in 1980; so “patriate” a new form of government, a coup half-way), Trudeau et als step in (secret committee) and order a new party created to run the referendum to dismantle Canada instead of Lesage (who apparently was going to be backed up by EII personally offering herself as the personification of “democracy”.

Who forms the new party?

Gilles Gregoire (who launched the attack on Gordon) (he’s a Social Crediter who apparently advocates some form of state planning — which could be Fabian Socialism)
Rene Levesque (commie who tried to construct a communist plan with Lesage et als in 1961)
RIN (disbands so the far-left members can join the PQ quietly)

What’s the party for: state planning – industrial democracy, the Yugoslav model of communism; same thing advocated by the NDP (Trudeau left the NDP to jump to the liberals to get it done).

 
WHo runs the “St. Jean Baptiste” (ethnic) riots for Pierre when he wants to be elected in 1968? Bourgault and the RIN, as far as I can tell. So the reds again are providing the mobilization, under the ethnic front.
 

Comments are closed.