D R A F T

Speed of the Communist operation

Gordon testifies on 20 November 1962; La Presse breaks the invented story on the 21st; Le Devoir underscores the lie on the 22nd; “reacts” on the 23rd; RIN assumes ethnic camouflage on 26th (modern patriots), burns Gordon in effigy; also on 26th, Pelletier reproaches businessmen’s luncheon over “fear” of state planning and abolition of free enterprise; RIN strikes again on the 29th (burns Gordon in effigy); Landry leads 1000+ students on 11 Dec. (burns Gordon in effigy).  On 17th Dec., Pearson suggests “royal commission”.  With this warm-up, the Communist FLQ may now strike, and they do in April 1963.  The “Gordon Incident” plus the FLQ terrorist attacks on “English” Canada in Montreal (1963-1967) provide the pretext for setting up the (Communist) PQ (1967-1968) to dismantle Canada by referendum for the “ethnic” needs of the French Canadians, but really to restructure Canada for Communism, while using Pearson’s “royal commission” as the front to seem to “legalize” it.

Communist-Controlled “Gordon Incident” used to legitimize restructuring Canada on French Canadian “ethnic” grounds

Q.:  Who attacked Gordon at the Railway Committee hearing?
A.:  Gilles Grégoire, future co-founder of the Communist Parti Québécois.  Also of note, Grégoire is with the Social Credit party when he attacks Donald Gordon (November 1962) but in 1968 he ends up with René Lévesque, founding a Communist party, which Lévesque is doing on orders of Pierre Trudeau, Jean Marchand, Maurice Sauvé and others in a secret committee at Power Corporation of Canada.

Q.:  Who mobilized protests and effigy burnings against Donald Gordon?
A.:  The Communist Rassemblement pour l’indépendance nationale (RIN), one of whose members became a leading FLQ Communist terrorist trained by Castro (Raymond Villeneuve).  The RIN joined Gilles Grégoire and René Lévesque in founding the Communist Parti Québécois by disbanding the RIN to allow their far-left members to quietly swell the ranks of the new PQ.  This prevented the public from seeing this vast assembly of far-left Communists joining forces with Grégoire and Lévesque.

Of first importance, the Communist RIN, in mobilizing the protests and effigy burnings, was able to assume the mask of the patriots of 1837-38, pretending to be “modern patriots” working for the rights of the ethnic French Canadians.  In this way, thanks to the Gordon attack, and the timing (just before the anniversary of the 1837-38 rebellions), the far-left RIN was able to camouflage the Communist operation, including the forthcoming entry of the Communist FLQ terrorists who featured on their pennon the image of a patriot from the same historic rebellion.

Q.:  Who else mobilized protests and effigy burnings against Donald Gordon?
A.:  Marxist Bernard Landry, law student of Pierre Trudeau, and future leader of the Communist Parti Québécois; (in power during 9/11 with a “cultural trade mission” at the Towers on 9/11.)  Author of books advocating continental arrangements in North America; in 1985 Le Devoir interview, Landry reveals the Mulroney-NAFTA “talks” (Quebec Summit) are carrying out the annexation of Canada.

Effigy-burnings took place in a number of other locations, largely if not always by students, apparently as copy-cat protests.

Q.:  Who is the “conservative” prime minister of Canada when the attack on Gordon is launched?
A.:  John George Diefenbaker, who in 1969 is found entering the Soviet embassy in Ottawa to celebrate the anniversary of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution (Communist overthrow of Russia).  (In 1960, Diefenbaker gives us a taste of our new constitution, the upcoming coup Charter, with his 1960 Bill of Rights, a shoe-horn to train the judges to stop deferring to Parliament under the Westminster system).  Perfect timing; as the Gordon Incident swings into high gear with demands for an “Inquiry”, the press begin to announce a federal election is coming; Diefenbaker rolls out of the way, lets Communist Pearson step in to implement the Communist-packed “royal commission of inquiry”.

Q.:  Who masterminded the yellow press attack on Gordon?
A.:  Major French press under Communist control:  (1) La Presse broke the manufactured “story” (Editor-in-Chief Gérard Pelletier, also the founder with Trudeau of the pro-Soviet review, Cité Libre); (2) Le Devoir “reacted” to the invented story (Editor-in-Chief André Laurendeau, part of a red circle fingered by historian Robert Rumilly in 1956).

Q.:  What government is in power in Quebec during the Gordon attack?
A.:  The Jean Lesage “Liberal” government, with plans to revolutionize Education (import Marxist professors), oust the confessional system of the founding peoples (Catholic, Protestant); attempt a Communist plan to run the economy; and hold a referendum on the false pretext of giving the French Canadians a “true national home” (i.e., an ethnic front for seizing all the powers to construct a Communist Plan).  The Lesage government had just been re-elected in September 1962 on a single-issue platform, nationalization of hydroelectricity.  The plan to gut the Education system was not on the table; so, the staged attack Gordon, claiming he had called French Canadians incompetent, was turned to advantage to then criticize the Quebec Education system … which would then seem to “publicly” authorize the intended restructuring.

Q.:  What happened within weeks of the attack on Gordon?
A.:  Enter stage left:  Castro-trained Communist FLQ terrorists strike “English” targets in Montreal.  Without the “Gordon Incident” and the Communist-mobilized protests, the FLQ had no pretext to enter.  Furthermore, the FLQ were in training from 1959 onward, some three years before the “Gordon Incident”; why were they training terrorists to attack Canada, what good would it have done without the “Gordon Incident” to manufacture allegations of racism on the part of English-speaking Canada?  The FLQ was being set up without any trigger at all in place; only once the FLQ was ready to launch the attack was the TRIGGER put into place by all of the above collaborating: Trudeau, Pelletier, Laurendeau, Grégoire, the RIN, Landry.

Q.:  Who conceptualized the attack on Gordon?
A.:  Pierre Elliott Trudeau in the April 1962 issue of Cité Libre (“La Nouvelle Trahison des Clercs), co-published by Trudeau with his Communist colleague, Gérard Pelletier, Editor-in-Chief of La Presse, which broke the invented story and launched the attack on Gordon.

Q.:  What does CITE LIBRE mean?
A.:  FREE CITY. Precisely as called for in the 1972 PQ manifesto, which plans to decentralize all legislative powers into a new structure involving a “radical revalorization of the municipal entity”.  The object becomes more clear by 2014 when PQ strategist Guy Bertrand publishes his Liberty-Nation Project with a view to urging the proto-Soviet regions to convert themselves into city-states by attacking the Quebec legislature to force it to hand over (decentralize) powers by issuing UDI to take the powers from Otatwa.  Follow the timeline as that develops parallel with various failed attempts to dismantle Canada, i.e. the 1980, 1992, 1995 referendums; the Meech Lake Accord, etc.

Q.:  Where was Pierre Elliott Trudeau in April of 1960?
A.:  He was with Fidel Castro, in Cuba.  (Source: Trudeau’s DVD Memoirs, which allege April 1961; however, the year 1960 is correct, according to other timeline incidents recounted by other biographers; and more particularly as proven by the United States Coast Guard records from Key West in Florida.

Q.:  Who put Castro into place in Cuba?
A.:  Canadians assisted.  The son of a General involved in WWII supplied cash and arms to Castro, and personally went to fight with him.

Demands for an “inquiry” because of the “Gordon Incident” lead to a royal commission.

///// Q.:  Object of the Royal Commission? Conclusions of the Royal Commission?
Restructure Canada; take the most minimal characteristic of Canada and substitute it for Confederation, while calling for its augmentation as the basis of the country (i.e. it’s Sovietism, and Zionism) /////

Q.:  What emerges in the surrounding news?
Q.:  As the story breaks, Pelletier delivers a plea for Communism to a Canadian business luncheon (covered by Lysiane Gagnon of La Presse, confirmed at Bilderberg in 1991). As the story develops, demands are made for an “inquiry”, first at CN, then in all Crown corporations and all across Canada; the terms “bilingualism” and “biculturalism” are fed into the public debate by the Communist-controlled press, establishing the cover of the upcoming “royal commission on bilingualism and biculturalism” under Soviet Agent Lester Bowles Pearson, with Le Devoir Editor-in-Chief André Laurendeau co-chairing the committee while hosting FLQ terrorist leaders from Pelletier and Trudeau’s Cité Libre in his home basement to write and publish a far-left Marxist rag. As the story builds, the news is full of signs and portents that Confederation is being terminated: change the flag; change the basis of the country to multiculturalism; numerous headlines document Marchand, Pelletier, Grégoire and others promoting State planning to the public (while in fact attacking the country to break it up to do it); in other words they are trying to generate a little passing support for their criminality.

Q.:  Who joins the attack on Gordon in the railway committee?
A.:  Lionel Chevrier, Liberal “star” of the House of Commons, under Soviet Agent Lester Bowles Pearson leading the Official Opposition.
A.:  Rouleau xxxx
A.:  xxxxx

Q.:  Why the target, the Canadian National Railway?
A.:  Essential to dismantling Confederation, the CNR was built under constitutional provisions of the BNA Act of 1867 to merge the British North American colonies east-west into a nation.  In 1987 (circa) Mulroney, acting far outside the law under the 1982 coup constitution, dismantled and privatized the CNR, whose new slogan is “CN: North America’s Railroad”.  The CNR, built to unify Canada and assure its independence, has been sidetracked as the centerpiece in the north-south continental merger to annex Canada.
 

Comments are closed.