Donald Gordon              

What did he really say?

Why did he say it?  And was there an agenda behind the alleged “incident”?  That is what this web site is all about.  Did Donald Gordon hurl racial insults against French Canadians to a parliamentary committee and the House of Commons?  Did Donald Gordon say or even imply that French Canadians were incompetent, unable to accede to senior posts in Canadian National?  What really happened on November 20th, 1962 in the parliamentary committee on railways of the House of Commons in Ottawa?

What was the subject of the discussion in which these racist comments were supposed to have been made?  Who asked the questions, what were the questions, and were they out of order?

Did the press invent the racial insults and put them into Gordon’s mouth through the headlines?  If so, why?

Some answers will be offered, as we identify the who, the what, the when, the why and the wherefore.  The tools at our disposal are the parliamentary committee minutes, the federal Hansard, the Constitution, the statute books, the history books, and the press of the day.  Even Mr. Gordon’s own account of this event will be taken into consideration.

The short answer is this:  In November of 1962, the major French press in Quebec (La Presse, Le Devoir) were Communist-controlled.  The effigy burnings, the demonstrations and the near-riots were all Communist-mobilized.  And the timing fit an agenda:  the dismantling of Canada for the North American Union was about to get underway.

To avoid charges of high treason, the country had to be made dysfunctional.  It had to seem to pull itself apart.  But as on 9/11, the process for blowing the foundations (would be) was going to be remote-controlled demolition.

Canada’s modern history has been written by water bugs tracing showy and glimmering lines on the surface.  However, truth lies below the waves, beyond the water bugs.

Step into my Time Macine.  We are going back to 1962 and the turbulent demonstrations in downtown Montreal, Ottawa, Saint-Denis, etc., for a bird’s-eye view of what historians call “The Gordon Incident”.

/////// Insert a video clip of the collected images of the near-riots and the effigy burnings. ///////

What About the Canadian National Railway?

The Canadian National Railway (CNR or “CN”) is a fundamental part of the constitution of Canada.  The Railway is provided for in the British North America Act of 1867, as follows:

X.—Intercolonial Railway.

Duty of Government and Parliament of Canada to make Railway herein described.

145.  Inasmuch as the Provinces of Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick have joined in a Declaration that the Construction of the Intercolonial Railway is essential to the Consolidation of the Union of British North America, and to the Assent thereto of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick, and have consequently agreed that Provision should be made for its immediate Construction by the Government of Canada:  Therefore, in order to give effect to that Agreement, it shall he the Duty of the Government and Parliament of Canada to provide for the Commencement, within Six Months after the Union, of a Railway connecting the River St. Lawrence with the City of Halifax in Nova Scotia, and for the Construction thereof without Intermission, and the Completion thereof with all practicable Speed.

– – –
In the “Topos du Jour” (Topics of the Day) column in La Presse on 30 November 1962, Guy Cormier (who also appears to write for Gerard Pelletier’s Cite Libre), produced a column and a half under the title “Tamponnement” (apparently a railway term).

Tamponnement

LES CHEMINS de fer, qui devaient, dans la pensée de ceux qui les ont construits, cimenter la Confédération, apparaissent comme le symbole même de la désunion et du désaccord.

(translation:)  THE RAILWAYS, which, in the minds of those who built them, were to cement the Confederation, seem to be the very symbol of disunion and discord.

– – –

What was the Canadian National Railway?
How long did it last? What happened to it?
Did the “Gordon Incident” have anything to do with disposing of it?

The Canadian National Railway was built to merge far-flung colonies across half a continent into a nation. The Railway embodied the motto, “A Mare Usque Ad Mare” (from sea to shining sea).

The Canadian National was built as a counterpoint to the vertical tug of the USA, so that Canada would exist forever.

In building the CN Railway, (found where in 1867???) the goal of the Fathers of Confederation was to lay down in steel what the British North America Act, the Constitution, had laid down on paper.

Then, do a little flash-back, introduce the press control. Find bio data on Andre Laurendeau and Gerard Pelletier AT THE TIME they each got their jobs as Editor in Chief at Le Devoir and La Presse.

I may have to back-paddle to the Pierre Trudeau “Canoe Incident” to flesh out the context and the path toward and agenda.

– Give background to the agencies involved, the SSJB, the Montreal Work Council, etc., the FTQ, all those who demanded Donald Gordon’s head, alleging he was a (racist??).
 

– What other events were breaking in the news simultaneously with the Gordon Incident? Federal elections, socialist state planning, major education reforms (gutting the Church, which underpinned Quebec’s culture),

I need a print-screen of CN North America’s Railway, and HOLS it, for the front of this web site.  By 2008, it’s obvious that the continent is being restructured and integrated, again using state-sponsored terrorism, this time 9/11.  Therefore, Donald Gordon, as president of CN (formerly with Bank of Canada), may have been motivated to cooperate in the false flag of 1962, using him to fire up anti-Canada hatred and demands for “separatism” (restructuring).
 
The “Gordon Incident”, as it has become known, has been called xxx xxx xxxx.

However, it was, in fact, a false flag staged by the federal level under Prime Minister John George Diefenbaker in collusion with a communist ring in Quebec identified by Robert Rumilly in 1956.

The ultimate purpose of the false flag was to put in motion a series of controlled events to be used as a pretext to dismantle and restructure Canada into a string of Communist city-states in a North American Soviet region.

The Communist tactic of using French Canadian ethnicity as their camouflage and operating front is employed full throttle with the Communist-fabricated, fully stage-managed “Gordon Incident”.

The communist objectives of the false flag are clear within a week, even days, of the story being front-page headlined.  The signs and portents are in every issue of the major French press, La Presse and Le Devoir, both of which at the time were in the hands of Editors in chief who were Communist subversives.  Gerard Pelletier, Editor in Chief of La Presse, would be fired two years later by the Catholic owners of the paper for his Communist activities.  André Laurendeau, Editor in Chief of the leftist Le Devoir, identified by Rumilly as a chief mouthpiece of the ring in Quebec, will be found in the collegial company of up-and-coming FLQ terrorist leaders employed as writers by Pelletier’s Cité Libre, during the “royal commission” set up as one of the objects of the November 1962 false flag.

– the royal commission demanded
– separatism declared
– prepared the way for the FLQ communist terrorists to enter stage-left
– which in turn allowed a “political solution” to be substituted for the violence: the PQ was formed to run “sovereignty” referendums.

In November of 1962, when the “Gordon Incident” was unleashed on Canada, the ring controlled the major Quebec French press. Fabricated statements were attributed to Gordon by that press to make him out as a racist who could barely tolerate the presence of French Canadians in the Railway company he directed.  However, the statements attributed were never made by Mr. Gordon; and were further warped by twisting of the context, omission of facts, and misrepresentation.

the attack on gordon came from future co-founder of the communist PQ, Gilles Gregoire; the PQ was eventually set up on orders of Trudeau, Marchand and others of the ring sitting on a secret committee at Power Corporation, attested by diplomatic despatches of a CIA operative from Washington assigned to Ottawa as a diplomat.

– – –

The Gordon Incident actually stretched over several weeks, and was piloted to the brink of public riot by communist groups mislabeled “separatists”.

– – –

Thinkng of “new symbols” “new men” by Maxwell Cohen.

A new flag was planted in the soil of British North America by new conquerors, about to alter its character, and eliminate its people.

– – –
Let’s start with the post-war. Canada was going to get a new flag, a new constitution, and a new population.

– – –

A Scotsman and a Frenchman founded Canada. In 1962, another Scotsman and a (bunch of) Communist Frenchment unfounded it.

= = =

What About CN?

Canadian National Railway was made a part of the British North America Act of 1867.  Its constitutional purpose was to merge the far-flung colonies into a nation. The CNR was a Crown corporation. Today, CN is “North America’s Railroad”, a privatized network (merging or on the way to merging?) the continent. The principal shareholder is alleged to be Bill Gates. CN is one of the transnational corporations involved in the CCCE, based in Canada; an elite xxx xxx xxxx; In 2008, CN co-sponsored the Model Parliament for North America hosted by the North American Forum on Integration.

In other words, the “separatist” movement set off by the “Gordon Incident” of 1962, which (concretized) in the founding of the Communist Parti Quebecois, is is still today essential to dismantling Canada, and North America, to complete the merger of the continent.

The modern CN web site (on 27 September 2017) features a map of CN train routes and the slogan:  “CN is North America’s Railroad”.  CN is constitutionally supposed to be “Canada’s Railroad”.  How does it all tie up to the 1962 parliamentary railway committee, and the launch in earnest of the movement to dismantle Canada?

– 30 –

Notes: I need the detailed history of how Mulroney (Mr. NAFTa) disposed of the CN. Surely, he had no legal authority to dispose of it.

Notes: I need the membership list of the CCCE with CN on it.

Notes: I need the membership list of the NACC, to see if CN is on it.

Notes: Gordon was a banker. This has to feed in somewhere.

Notes: the map and slogan are on the CN Quick Facts and figures page. Try again to PDF it. See if it’s backed up yet in the Wayback Machine.

– 30 –

RULE BY RABBLE-ROUSING

This web site is also about ruling by rabble-rousing.  Staging synthetic incidents to stir up the people from below, while guiding them to an objective from above.
 

Comments are closed.